File: D:/hMailServer/Data/sarahharvey.com/bob/03/{03B32A43-E32D-48A8-AAC9-479B4DD71A2B}.eml
Received: from authenticated-user (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256))
(No client certificate requested)
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A434F4354B
for <bob@sarahharvey.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hvabkd.mainpostrh.top (hvabkd.mainpostrh.top [89.44.80.177])
by mail.itpartnership.com with ESMTPS
(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256)
; Mon, 27 Jul 2026 11:34:55 +0100
From: "Pete Donat" <pete@ddppartnershq.info>
To: <bob@sarahharvey.com>
References: <a25aaca2-6b2c-4310-a397-a89b0ca65822@ddppartnershq.info>
In-Reply-To: <a2528c3b-9f1d-4c1b-b988-a35704d51df0@ddppartnershq.info>
Subject: Re: Bob / Pete
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 11:34:38 +0100
Message-ID: <a25aaca2-6b2c-4310-a397-a89b0ca65822@ddppartnershq.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQMCzKoY95XV8dMDzk0qG15D+uWK+QMCzKoY
X-OlkEid: 00000000CC09373165EA424894A88D7C135300090700C3B68E10F77511CEB4CD00AA00BBB6E600000000000B0000F3CAA7D39DC9FE498D8F5D237175EB7800000000DBBF0000528746DF551BEC45BA5E2D6A106EB4B8
Hi Bob,
Would you be open to a quick introductory call, or should I send over some
details on the options first?
Kind regards,
Pete Donat
Managing Director | DDP Partners
If it's not relevant, just reply 'no,' and I'll stop any further
communication.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 5:26:48 AM Pete Donat <pete@ddppartnershq.info> wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> Saw you run a recruitment consultancy in Coventry, wanted to send a quick
> intro. With this kind of work, working capital often comes up as something
> that needs backing.
>
> I give owners a straight read on what's out there and help them land on
> something that fits, up to £1m.
>
> Anything you're thinking about on that front?
>
> Pete Donat
> Managing Director | DDP Partners
>
> If it's not relevant, just reply 'no,' and I'll stop any further
> communication.